This is the third in a series of blog posts (the first is here, second here) that introduce draft sections of the new OJS 3 documentation, in preparation for the upcoming release.
This time, we’re looking at the review process. Because reviewers, like authors, are often new to the system, we need to make this as easy as we can for them. This document outlines the multiple stages of the review process, including the editor assigning reviewers, reviewers doing the review, authors responding to requested revisions, and editors accepting revisions and moving on to copyediting.
We’re not only interested in your feedback on the documentation, but also on the design decisions we’ve made for the new versions of the software. You can use the comment feature below, or use the comments within the document itself.
To better view the screenshots, increase the zoom on the Google doc up to 150 or 200%.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JgBbY-cjkS9I01LaW5QoNCl1dihvTw4PqT1JepC4vq4/edit#
Thanks for your input!
