No database table name prefix in OJS 2.1?

Are you responsible for making OJS work -- installing, upgrading, migrating or troubleshooting? Do you think you've found a bug? Post in this forum.

Moderators: jmacgreg, btbell, michael, bdgregg, barbarah, asmecher

Forum rules
The Public Knowledge Project Support Forum is moving to

This forum will be maintained permanently as an archived historical resource, but all new questions should be added to the new forum. Questions will no longer be monitored on this old forum after March 30, 2015.
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:42 am
Location: CZ

No database table name prefix in OJS 2.1?

Postby richol » Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:52 am

Due to our hosting limitations would it be handsome to have the possibility to setup the database tables name prefix. Is it something like that able with OSJ v2.1?

thx Richard

Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Postby mjordan » Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:45 am

Hi Richard,

Currently there is no table prefix option, but we will add it to the next release. Good suggestion.


Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:56 am

Re: No database table name prefix in OJS 2.1?

Postby bijaan » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:13 am

As far as I can tell from this entry in the PKP bugzilla:

this is still not on the way? It would be very helpful for those of us unable to use more than one database for all our different systems.

Posts: 10015
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:56 pm

Re: No database table name prefix in OJS 2.1?

Postby asmecher » Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:47 am

Hi bijaan,

There's no progress on that entry to report, and as I've commented on the bug, it's a low priority. The bug entry is the best place to check for updates and if you CC yourself on the entry you'll be notified when its status changes.

Alec Smecher
Public Knowledge Project Team

Return to “OJS Technical Support”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests