OJS and law reviews

Are you an Editor, Author, or Journal Manager in need of help? Want to talk to us about workflow issues? This is your forum.

Moderators: jmacgreg, michael, vgabler, John

Forum rules
The Public Knowledge Project Support Forum is moving to http://forum.pkp.sfu.ca

This forum will be maintained permanently as an archived historical resource, but all new questions should be added to the new forum. Questions will no longer be monitored on this old forum after March 30, 2015.
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:47 am

OJS and law reviews

Postby lschiff » Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:52 pm

We are exploring how OJS workflows might need to be modified to support the particular publication practices of law reviews, including things like a plugin for importing Expresso submissions, expanding the copyediting stage, etc. and are curious to know what others have done in this area before we dive in. I noticed a previous post on using the peer review workflow as a surrogate for the copyediting workflow, but I think that would be confusing to journal editors, especially since they change every year.

Lisa Schiff
California Digital Library
University of California

Return to “OJS Editorial Support and Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest