http://pkp-www.lib.sfu.ca:8084/wiki/index.php?title=Open_Reviews&feed=atom&action=history 2013-05-18T23:10:12Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.20.5 http://pkp-www.lib.sfu.ca:8084/wiki/index.php?title=Open_Reviews&diff=2291&oldid=prev 2011-09-13T17:54:26Z

<p>added Socially Networked Open Peer Review</p> <table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 17:54, 13 September 2011</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 17:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 17:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>See also the related [[Liquid Publishing]] project.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>See also the related [[Liquid Publishing]] project.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">== Socially Networked Open Peer Review ==</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">You might find [[Socially Networked Open Peer Review|the following howto on implementing open peer review via social networking]] interesting.</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Ned14 http://pkp-www.lib.sfu.ca:8084/wiki/index.php?title=Open_Reviews&diff=1602&oldid=prev 2010-11-09T14:32:59Z

<p></p> <table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 14:32, 9 November 2010</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 3:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>== What is this? ==</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>== What is this? ==</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Open Reviews is an alternative to the standard double-blind peer review process. In a double-blind process the editor typically chooses reviewers, and reviewers do not know who authored the article. In an open review, reviewers can typically self-select and comment anonymously on any article they choose.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Open Reviews is an alternative to the standard double-blind peer review process. In a double-blind process the editor typically chooses reviewers, and reviewers do not know who authored the article<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">, and the authors do not know the names of the reviewers</ins>. In an open review, reviewers can typically self-select and comment anonymously on any article they choose.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Open Reviews have long been a topic on our [http://pkp.sfu.ca/wiki/index.php/PKP_Frequently_Asked_Questions#Does_OJS_support_open_peer_review.3F FAQ].</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Open Reviews have long been a topic on our [http://pkp.sfu.ca/wiki/index.php/PKP_Frequently_Asked_Questions#Does_OJS_support_open_peer_review.3F FAQ].</div></td></tr> </table>

71.17.161.99 http://pkp-www.lib.sfu.ca:8084/wiki/index.php?title=Open_Reviews&diff=1574&oldid=prev 2010-10-20T21:36:20Z

<p>Created page with &quot;= PKP 2011 Hackfest - Open Reviews Project = == What is this? == Open Reviews is an alternative to the standard double-blind peer review process. In a double-blind process the ...&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>= PKP 2011 Hackfest - Open Reviews Project =<br /> <br /> == What is this? ==<br /> <br /> Open Reviews is an alternative to the standard double-blind peer review process. In a double-blind process the editor typically chooses reviewers, and reviewers do not know who authored the article. In an open review, reviewers can typically self-select and comment anonymously on any article they choose.<br /> <br /> Open Reviews have long been a topic on our [http://pkp.sfu.ca/wiki/index.php/PKP_Frequently_Asked_Questions#Does_OJS_support_open_peer_review.3F FAQ].<br /> <br /> == What might be done in this project? ==<br /> <br /> There are many different models for open review processes, and all are experimental. For example:<br /> * http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05535.html<br /> * http://www.livingreviews.org<br /> * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_peer_review<br /> <br /> The goal of this project would be to choose a model and implement it somehow within OJS. This could be something as simple as reviewing existing features -- i.e. anonymous commenting on published articles -- and coming up with a detailed guide on how to perform an open review by combining those features as they currently exist, or as complicated as rewriting the double-blind review system to incorporate a new review model.<br /> <br /> See also the related [[Liquid Publishing]] project.</div>

24.80.164.10