Difference between revisions of "OJS Roadmap"

From PKP Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
;Submission as single file
 
;Submission as single file
 +
:Status: TBA
 
:Submission model might be made better by including the option to make a .pdf containing the article, all supplementary files and appropriate metadata.  Advantages include no need to de-identify properties, and review document is a single document - no need to download all figures, supplementary documents, etc in order to review.  Of course, letter to editor and other documents not for reviewers would need to be submitted not to be included.
 
:Submission model might be made better by including the option to make a .pdf containing the article, all supplementary files and appropriate metadata.  Advantages include no need to de-identify properties, and review document is a single document - no need to download all figures, supplementary documents, etc in order to review.  Of course, letter to editor and other documents not for reviewers would need to be submitted not to be included.
  

Revision as of 18:56, 8 August 2007

OJS Roadmap
Future directions for OJS
Less linear workflow
Status: TBA
Less downloading and uploading req'd for workflow
Possibility of using a single file for all workflow and tracking changes rather than submitting new files for each stage (perhaps with drag and drop, with copies left behind for documentation)
Better support for pre-prints
Status: TBA
"In press" section for articles that are currently in holding for actual publication.
Thesis Workflow Tool
Status: TBA
OJS as a thesis submission and tracking system.
SFU Library has a project on the books to develop a more robust thesis workflow tool.
Submission as single file
Status: TBA
Submission model might be made better by including the option to make a .pdf containing the article, all supplementary files and appropriate metadata. Advantages include no need to de-identify properties, and review document is a single document - no need to download all figures, supplementary documents, etc in order to review. Of course, letter to editor and other documents not for reviewers would need to be submitted not to be included.
Miscellaneous
Status: TBA
import transaction/rollback
more flexible statistics
arbitrary metadata gateway
Dspace export
user/article thesaurus/controlled vocabulary
user tagging
ACL:based permission classes
WYSIWYG special character handling (e.g., tinyMCE extension for latek)
"login as" behavior should be limited in certain contexts
centralized role management for plugins
featured article plugin/block
user friendly error handling/logging
local private messaging system a la phpBB