Difference between revisions of "OCS Roadmap"

From PKP Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
==Proposed for Future Release==
 
==Proposed for Future Release==
 +
 +
===User Interface===
  
 
* UI refactoring, most likely congruent with the proposed common framework development. See [http://pkp.sfu.ca/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2848 bug 2848] for one example, although this is a much larger issue than just buttons.  
 
* UI refactoring, most likely congruent with the proposed common framework development. See [http://pkp.sfu.ca/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2848 bug 2848] for one example, although this is a much larger issue than just buttons.  
  
* We need to provide some way to mass e-mail ACCEPTED authors only. Right now, the only option is to e-mail all authors, which becomes awkward about halfway through the management process of the conference (repeatedly needing to find and de-select the rejected authors).
+
* On the conference timeline, it is possible to close author registrations while submissions are still open. That should remain possible, but some kind of warning prompt would be ideal: "Do you really want to close author registration before the submissions are closed? Y/N".
  
* When a user logs in with NO role, some kind of useful message should be displayed. For example:
+
* Add support for full bilingualism - interface and content
  
Would you like to:
+
* Reword "path" in setup (not an absolute path, but an abbreviation). Perhaps the abbreviation should just be used by default.
+
[] Submit a proposal
+
[] Register as a conference reviewer
+
[] Register to attend the conference
+
  
This would help cut down on the many questions around this issue.
+
=== Email ===
  
* Ability for the Director to rapidly assign papers to reviewers. For example, from the list of papers, make it possible to check off a group of papers and press an "Assign to Reviewer" option, which would pull up a list of Reviewers. Select one, hit Go and that would be it.
+
* We need to provide some way to mass e-mail ACCEPTED authors only. Right now, the only option is to e-mail all authors, which becomes awkward about halfway through the management process of the conference (repeatedly needing to find and de-select the rejected authors).
  
* Incomplete submissions should not go to the "unassigned" queue.
+
* Add a "sent mail" email log for the CM.
  
* Ability to export abstracts, user data, etc. into a tab delimited and/or XML format for manipulation outside of OCS.
+
* When a registrant pays, have the system generate an email receipt.
  
* On the conference timeline, it is possible to close author registrations while submissions are still open. That should remain possible, but some kind of warning prompt would be ideal: "Do you really want to close author registration before the submissions are closed? Y/N".
+
=== Workflow ===
  
* Add a "sent mail" email log for the CM.
+
* Ability for the Director to rapidly assign papers to reviewers. For example, from the list of papers, make it possible to check off a group of papers and press an "Assign to Reviewer" option, which would pull up a list of Reviewers. Select one, hit Go and that would be it.
 +
 
 +
* Incomplete submissions should not go to the "unassigned" queue.
  
 
* Support for panel submissions.
 
* Support for panel submissions.
 
* Export list of unpaid registrants.
 
  
 
* Add a warning on the final stage of the submission process indicating that by clicking on the button the submission will be complete.
 
* Add a warning on the final stage of the submission process indicating that by clicking on the button the submission will be complete.
  
*. Allow authors to re-submit (if directed by the Director to do so) after submission deadline has passed.
+
* Add flexibility to include multiple options for the type of presentation being proposed.
  
 
* Make Blind Reviews optional, allowing Conference Managers to decide whether or not to include author information in the Submission Metadata, visible to the Reviewer.
 
* Make Blind Reviews optional, allowing Conference Managers to decide whether or not to include author information in the Submission Metadata, visible to the Reviewer.
  
* Add support for full bilingualism - interface and content
+
* Add flexibility to include more personal information from authors (e.g., title/rank/status of the individual, such as professor, student, professional, etc.)
  
* When a registrant pays, have the system generate an email receipt.
+
* Add a "review-lite" workflow option that simplifies/reduces the peer-review aspects and allows conference directors to focus on using
 +
OCS as an access, scheduling, and general logistical tool for their conference.
  
* Add flexibility to include multiple options for the type of presentation being proposed.
+
* Add a "collaborative review" workflow, where selected reviewers receive all submissions
  
* Add flexibility to include more personal information from authors (e.g., title/rank/status of the individual, such as professor, student, professional, etc.)
 
  
* Ability to set up as a single, one-off conference site
+
=== Import/export ===
  
* Allow Conference Manager and Director role to be merged for a simpler option
+
* Ability to export abstracts, user data, etc. into a tab delimited and/or XML format for manipulation outside of OCS.
  
* Add some kind of a link back to the main site, in addition to the HOME button, which links back to the Conference home
+
* Export list of unpaid registrants.
  
* Add a "review-lite" workflow option that simplifies/reduces the peer-review aspects and allows conference directors to focus on using
+
=== Miscellaneous ===
OCS as an access, scheduling, and general logistical tool for their conference.
+
  
* Add a "collaborative review" workflow, where selected reviewers receive all submissions
+
* When a user logs in with NO role, some kind of useful message should be displayed. For example:
  
* Allow Directors/Track Directors to assign themselves ("Assign Self") as the Reviewer for a submission within Director interface
+
Would you like to:
 +
 +
[] Submit a proposal
 +
[] Register as a conference reviewer
 +
[] Register to attend the conference
  
* Reword "path" in setup (not an absolute path, but an abbreviation). Perhaps the abbreviation should just be used by default.
+
This would help cut down on the many questions around this issue.
 +
 
 +
* Ability to set up as a single, one-off conference site
 +
 
 +
* Allow Conference Manager and Director role to be merged for a simpler option
  
 
* Add a budgeting module, which would allow conference managers to track conference expenses and generate cost reports.
 
* Add a budgeting module, which would allow conference managers to track conference expenses and generate cost reports.

Revision as of 08:50, 8 September 2008

Development Roadmap

Milestone 3.0 (Current - Q4 2009)

PKP Framework

Milestone 2.3 (Current - Q4 2008)

Proposed for Future Release

User Interface

  • UI refactoring, most likely congruent with the proposed common framework development. See bug 2848 for one example, although this is a much larger issue than just buttons.
  • On the conference timeline, it is possible to close author registrations while submissions are still open. That should remain possible, but some kind of warning prompt would be ideal: "Do you really want to close author registration before the submissions are closed? Y/N".
  • Add support for full bilingualism - interface and content
  • Reword "path" in setup (not an absolute path, but an abbreviation). Perhaps the abbreviation should just be used by default.

Email

  • We need to provide some way to mass e-mail ACCEPTED authors only. Right now, the only option is to e-mail all authors, which becomes awkward about halfway through the management process of the conference (repeatedly needing to find and de-select the rejected authors).
  • Add a "sent mail" email log for the CM.
  • When a registrant pays, have the system generate an email receipt.

Workflow

  • Ability for the Director to rapidly assign papers to reviewers. For example, from the list of papers, make it possible to check off a group of papers and press an "Assign to Reviewer" option, which would pull up a list of Reviewers. Select one, hit Go and that would be it.
  • Incomplete submissions should not go to the "unassigned" queue.
  • Support for panel submissions.
  • Add a warning on the final stage of the submission process indicating that by clicking on the button the submission will be complete.
  • Add flexibility to include multiple options for the type of presentation being proposed.
  • Make Blind Reviews optional, allowing Conference Managers to decide whether or not to include author information in the Submission Metadata, visible to the Reviewer.
  • Add flexibility to include more personal information from authors (e.g., title/rank/status of the individual, such as professor, student, professional, etc.)
  • Add a "review-lite" workflow option that simplifies/reduces the peer-review aspects and allows conference directors to focus on using

OCS as an access, scheduling, and general logistical tool for their conference.

  • Add a "collaborative review" workflow, where selected reviewers receive all submissions


Import/export

  • Ability to export abstracts, user data, etc. into a tab delimited and/or XML format for manipulation outside of OCS.
  • Export list of unpaid registrants.

Miscellaneous

  • When a user logs in with NO role, some kind of useful message should be displayed. For example:
Would you like to:

[] Submit a proposal
[] Register as a conference reviewer
[] Register to attend the conference

This would help cut down on the many questions around this issue.

  • Ability to set up as a single, one-off conference site
  • Allow Conference Manager and Director role to be merged for a simpler option
  • Add a budgeting module, which would allow conference managers to track conference expenses and generate cost reports.