Are you responsible for making OJS work -- installing, upgrading, migrating or troubleshooting? Do you think you've found a bug? Post in this forum.
Moderators: jmacgreg, btbell, michael, bdgregg, barbarah, asmecher
The Public Knowledge Project Support Forum is moving to http://forum.pkp.sfu.ca
This forum will be maintained permanently as an archived historical resource, but all new questions should be added to the new forum. Questions will no longer be monitored on this old forum after March 30, 2015.
I recently upgraded an OJS from 2.3.7 to 2.4. And one of the Editors has just report me two issues related to the new version.
First is that when author uploads a new version of the submission file it is not been automatically directed to review version area. Instead, editor has to download the new version and then upload it as revised review version. She is complaining that this step was not necessary in the previous OJS version.
Second, when editor rejects a submission it is not automatically been moved to "Archive" section, so she has to manually archive the submission. Again, she says that this was a nonexistent step in OJS 2.3.7
Hence, are these bugs or just changes in editorial process flow?
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:10 am
- Location: Brazil
Return to OJS Technical Support
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests