Hello,
What is the meaning of "revisions required", "resubmit for review" and "resubmit elsewhere"?
How each one differs in the workflow?
Roberta
The meaning of each type of recommendation
Moderators: jmacgreg, michael, jheckman, barbarah, btbell, bdgregg, asmecher
Forum rules
What to do if you have a technical problem with OJS:
1. Search the forum. You can do this from the Advanced Search Page or from our Google Custom Search, which will search the entire PKP site. If you are encountering an error, we especially recommend searching the forum for said error.
2. Check the FAQ to see if your question or error has already been resolved.
3. Post a question, but please, only after trying the above two solutions. If it's a workflow or usability question you should probably post to the OJS Editorial Support and Discussion subforum; if you have a development question, try the OJS Development subforum.
What to do if you have a technical problem with OJS:
1. Search the forum. You can do this from the Advanced Search Page or from our Google Custom Search, which will search the entire PKP site. If you are encountering an error, we especially recommend searching the forum for said error.
2. Check the FAQ to see if your question or error has already been resolved.
3. Post a question, but please, only after trying the above two solutions. If it's a workflow or usability question you should probably post to the OJS Editorial Support and Discussion subforum; if you have a development question, try the OJS Development subforum.
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The meaning of each type of recommendation
by roberta_takenaka » Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:03 pm
Roberta Mayumi Takenaka
- roberta_takenaka
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:28 am
- Location: Brasil
by John » Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:04 pm
Roberta
Assuming this is OJS 2.X...
Do consult the Journal Help link on the Review page where these options exist.
Editor Decsion:
*Revisions required: No action, as Editor waits for author to submit revisions for Editor to judge. Authors do not see these decisions so they must be conveyed to the author through the Editor/Author comment box
*Resubmit for Review: When author resubmits, that copy is selected to begin round #2 of the review process with same or new reviewers. OJS 2 is set up to manage multiple rounds. If this is OJS 1.X, then the author should be advised to submit as if it were a new submission.
*Resubmit elsewhere: Is a form of rejection and submission is archived.
Hope that's a help.
Assuming this is OJS 2.X...
Do consult the Journal Help link on the Review page where these options exist.
Editor Decsion:
*Revisions required: No action, as Editor waits for author to submit revisions for Editor to judge. Authors do not see these decisions so they must be conveyed to the author through the Editor/Author comment box
*Resubmit for Review: When author resubmits, that copy is selected to begin round #2 of the review process with same or new reviewers. OJS 2 is set up to manage multiple rounds. If this is OJS 1.X, then the author should be advised to submit as if it were a new submission.
*Resubmit elsewhere: Is a form of rejection and submission is archived.
Hope that's a help.
John Willinsky
Public Knowledge Project
University of British Columbia
Public Knowledge Project
University of British Columbia
- John
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 9:15 pm
- Location: University of British Columbia
Other doubt related
by roberta_takenaka » Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:08 am
John,
does "Resubmit for Review" make sense when it is a Reviewer decision?
does "Resubmit for Review" make sense when it is a Reviewer decision?
Roberta Mayumi Takenaka
- roberta_takenaka
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:28 am
- Location: Brasil
by John » Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:53 am
Roberta
This is not an uncommon category in my experience as a reviewer. When a reviewer recommends "resubmit for review," it says to the editor that the changes required are sufficiently major to warrant another bline review before accepting, while still seeing hope for the article making a contribution to the journal.
This is not an uncommon category in my experience as a reviewer. When a reviewer recommends "resubmit for review," it says to the editor that the changes required are sufficiently major to warrant another bline review before accepting, while still seeing hope for the article making a contribution to the journal.
John Willinsky
Public Knowledge Project
University of British Columbia
Public Knowledge Project
University of British Columbia
- John
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 9:15 pm
- Location: University of British Columbia
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to OJS Technical Support
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests