Software Hosting and Development Services available at PKP Publishing Services
As the developers of Open Journal Systems, Open Conference Systems, Open Harvester Systems, and Open Monograph Press, the PKP team are experts in helping journal managers and conference organizers make the most of their online publishing projects. PKP Publishing Services offers support for:
As a customer of PKP Publishing Services, you will not only receive direct, personalized support from the PKP Development Team, but will be contributing to the ongoing development of the PKP applications. All funds raised by PKP Publishing Services go directly toward enhancing our free, open source software. For more information, please contact us.
Are you responsible for making OCS work -- installing, upgrading, migrating or troubleshooting? Do you think you've found a bug? Post in this forum.
Moderators: jmacgreg, michael, John
Forum rules
What to do if you have a technical problem with OCS:1.
Search the forum. You can do this from the
Advanced Search Page or from our
Google Custom Search, which will search the entire PKP site. If you are encountering an error, we
especially recommend searching the forum for said error.
2.
Check the FAQ to see if your question or error has already been resolved. Please note that this FAQ is OJS-centric, but most issues are applicable to both platforms.
3.
Post a question, but please, only after trying the above two solutions. If it's a workflow or usability question you should probably post to the
OCS Conference Support and Discussion subforum; if you have a development question, try the
OCS Development subforum.
by edithlin » Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:43 am
Hi
In author's view, 'Review Version' on PAPER REVIEW page is always 'None'.
I'm testing the 'Abstract followed by presentation' submission mode. For track director, 'Review Version' shows a copy of presenter's paper file.
I tried to trace the program and I found that in classes\submission\presenter\PresenterAction.inc.php, designateReviewVersion function, default $stage is REVIEW_STAGE_ABSTRACT even for REVIEW_MODE_BOTH_SEQUENTIAL case. I wonder if this is the cause of the problems.
Any suggestions?
Edith
-
edithlin
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:05 am
by jmacgreg » Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:08 pm
Hi Edith,
This is the same issue as
http://pkp.sfu.ca/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3276, correct? We're currently going through beta testing of OCS 2.1, and I'd like to doublecheck that bug 3276 is/will be addressed.
Thanks,
James
-
jmacgreg
-
- Posts: 4153
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 10:50 am
-
by edithlin » Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:14 am
Hi James
No. I'm afraid that there are two different issues.
Bug 3276 is concerning the reviewer's comment file while my new thread is referring to the presenter's paper file.
Edith
-
edithlin
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:05 am
Return to OCS Technical Support
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest