Are you an Editor, Author, or Journal Manager in need of help? Want to talk to us about workflow issues? This is your forum.
Moderators: jmacgreg, michael, vgabler, John
The Public Knowledge Project Support Forum is moving to http://forum.pkp.sfu.ca
This forum will be maintained permanently as an archived historical resource, but all new questions should be added to the new forum. Questions will no longer be monitored on this old forum after March 30, 2015.
From time to time, we run across potential reviewers who either no longer do reviews, or who do such awful reviews that we don't want to touch them with a barge pole ever again. The problem with simply deleting these people is the fallible human memory -- adding someone back in because the reason they had been removed has been forgotten (possibly even that they were once reviewers and were removed). It is also a problem where editorship or assistant editorship changes -- the new person won't know what the first person did. So, what I am looking for is a way to mark potential reviewers as retired, too busy to do reviews, never responds to review requests, always says no.... you get the idea. I know that reviewers can be ranked from 1 to 5, but that is a pretty blunt instrument for what I want to do....
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:57 am
Return to OJS Editorial Support and Discussion
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest