You are viewing the PKP Support Forum | PKP Home Wiki

"In Review" status for items with editor decisions

Are you an Editor, Author, or Journal Manager in need of help? Want to talk to us about workflow issues? This is your forum.

Moderators: jmacgreg, michael, vgabler, John

Forum rules
The Public Knowledge Project Support Forum is moving to http://forum.pkp.sfu.ca

This forum will be maintained permanently as an archived historical resource, but all new questions should be added to the new forum. Questions will no longer be monitored on this old forum after March 30, 2015.

"In Review" status for items with editor decisions

Postby eblwelch » Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:29 am

Hi folks,
I've searched everywhere and can't find any information on the following. Submissions with editor decisions of "Revisions Required" and "Resubmit for Review" remain in the "In Review" queue even though they in fact await author action (revision/resubmission). This is problematic for several reasons. First, it misleads the author who might think no action is necessary if the e-mail communicating the decision went into his/her e-mail spam folder. Second, these items clog up the editor's "In Review" queue. Third, there is no trigger to alert author or editor that a deadline for revision/resubmission has passed and prompt a change of decision to reject. It just sits there forever. Am I missing something? Is there a solution or maybe this is something that could be worked on for the 3.x?
Many thanks!
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: "In Review" status for items with editor decisions

Postby asmecher » Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:24 pm

Hi James,

The submission is technically "in review" even throughout communication with the author; it moves out of review when it is either accepted or rejected. You can use the envelope icon to contact the author, after a "revisions required" decision has been recorded, to let them know that something needs doing. There are no deadlines for authors to upload revisions -- the only deadlines currently implemented in the system, subscriptions aside, are for reviewers to perform reviews.

Alec Smecher
Public Knowledge Project Team
Posts: 10015
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:56 pm

Re: "In Review" status for items with editor decisions

Postby eblwelch » Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:15 am

Dear Alec,
Thanks for your thorough response. This scenerio is not ideal, but at least now I know the limitations of the system. If there is space in the suggestion box, I'd like to propose implementing a new status "Awaiting revisions" with an accompanying deadline & automatic reminder similar to that used for reviews. Since many journals allow 3 months or more for revisions, but not forever, this would help keep the "In Review" list limited to items actually in review in terms of workflow. This status is used by many other editorial systems (for example Editorial Manager, BMC, PLOS) and is very useful for both authors and editors.
Thanks for your consideration.
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 5:03 pm

Return to OJS Editorial Support and Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest