Are you an Editor, Author, or Journal Manager in need of help? Want to talk to us about workflow issues? This is your forum.
Moderators: jmacgreg, michael, vgabler, John
This forum is meant for general questions about the usability of OJS from an everyday user's perspective: journal managers, authors, and editors are welcome to post questions here, as are librarians and other support staff. We welcome general questions about the role of OJS and how the workflow works, as well as specific function- or user-related questions. What to do if you have general, workflow or usability questions about OJS:
1. Read the documentation
. We've written documentation to cover from OJS basics to system administration and code development, and we encourage you to read it.
2. take a look at the tutorials
. We will continue to add tutorials covering OJS basics as time goes on.
3. Post a question
. Questions are always welcome here, but if it's a technical question you should probably post to the OJS Technical Support
subforum; if you have a development question, try the OJS Development
I am the Journal manager of a multilanguage journal and we are experiencing a problem when trying to use the "save to Mendeley" plugin: both, the translated version and the one in the original language, are detected by Mendeley as the same article. When we create the pdf files we include different metadata (xmp file) for each file. They even have different DOIs. But when we upload them to the journal OJS assigns the same doi to both (I have exported their corresponding xml files and the assigned doi is the same).
Is there a way to assign different DOIs to the translated and the original language versions?
Or an alternative: is there a way to get OJS to recognize the metadata of the pdf file, or maybe to import our xmp file and assign it to the article of our choice thus replacing the metadata (particularly the DOI) generated by OJS?
Has anyone experienced a similar problem with the "Save to Mendeley" plugin?
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 2:29 pm
OJS doesn't currently work with XMP data; it uses its own metadata to feed the COinS data in the article's summary page, which I think is what feeds Mendeley. DOIs come from OJS's own DOI configuration, not the DOIs specified in the PDF. If you need to have distinct DOIs for each translation, you'll need to have each language as an entirely separate OJS submission.
Public Knowledge Project Team
- Posts: 10015
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:56 pm
Return to OJS Editorial Support and Discussion
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 2 guests