Are you a Director, Presenter, Reviewer or Conference Manager in need of help? Want to talk to us about workflow issues? This is your forum.
Moderators: jmacgreg, michael
This forum is meant for general questions about the usability of OCS from an everyday user's perspective: conference managers, presenters, and directors are welcome to post questions here, as are librarians and other support staff. We welcome general questions about the role of OCS and how the workflow works, as well as specific function- or user-related questions. What to do if you have general, workflow or usability questions about OCS:
1. Read the documentation
. We've written documentation to cover from OCS basics to system administration and code development, and we encourage you to read it.
2. take a look at the tutorials
. We will continue to add tutorials covering OCS basics as time goes on.
3. Post a question
. Questions are always welcome here, but if it's a technical question you should probably post to the OCS Technical Support
subforum; if you have a development question, try the OCS Development
I'm about to setup OCS for my universitie's intern postersession. As we don't want to do any reviewing, I'm struggling on howto undergo the whole reviewing process in OCS (I can select the "this track is not peer-reviewed" option, but still people can't automatically upload their posters and have to wait for acceptance by the track director).
Any ideas are greatly appreciated!
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:36 am
Return to OCS Conference Support and Discussion
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest