Bug 3891 - Review Policy flexibility
Review Policy flexibility
Status: NEW
Product: OJS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Journal Management
2.4.x
PC Windows NT
: P1 normal
Assigned To: PKP Support
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-11-25 09:13 PST by Kevin Stranack
Modified: 2012-09-24 08:30 PDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Version Reported In:
Also Affects:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kevin Stranack 2008-11-25 09:13:34 PST
In Setup Step 2.2, it would be desirable to have greater granularity with the Review Process. Ideally, the Editor could select which process to use on a case-by-case basis (or, each Reviewer could have their preference recorded in their profile).
Comment 1 Alec Smecher 2009-06-17 16:04:34 PDT
This could be easily changed at any level -- for each reviewer, when each review is assigned, etc. I'd suggest including it as a checkbox on the "review request" email template. Is it important that each reviewer's preference be tracked?
Comment 2 Alec Smecher 2009-07-24 13:59:53 PDT
Deferring (needs more description)
Comment 3 Alec Smecher 2012-09-24 08:30:32 PDT
I haven't heard any interest in this since the original entry in 2008. Kevin, can we close?