<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://pkp.sfu.ca/bugzilla/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="4.2.5+"
          urlbase="http://pkp.sfu.ca/bugzilla/"
          
          maintainer="pkp-hosted@sfu.ca"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2796</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2007-04-12 06:41:00 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Multiple Rounds of Review Workflow broken?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2007-04-13 12:14:47 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>OCS</product>
          <component>Review</component>
          <version>2.0</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P1</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ramon Fonseca">ramon</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="PKP Support">pkp-support</assigned_to>
          
          
          

      

      

      

          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>8176</commentid>
            <who name="Ramon Fonseca">ramon</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-12 06:41:53 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>I submitted a paper (with the Review option Abstract then Review).
Reviewed abstract and accepted (didn&apos;t test resubmit for review or revisions required).

Then reviewed paper and when chose resubmit for review.
Document went to editing, instead of remaining in review.

Reviwer - Recommendation Resubmit for Review 2007-04-12
Track Director - Decision Revisions Required 2007-04-12

Shouldn&apos;t it allow a new round?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>8178</commentid>
            <who name="Alec Smecher">alec</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-12 08:42:05 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>We opted not to support multiple rounds of review for conference submissions, as it&apos;s not a common process for conferences. John, I suppose we should remove the Reviewer decision &quot;Resubmit for Review&quot;. 

Ramón, the Editor decision &quot;Resubmit for Review&quot; has been removed, and submissions should only move into Editing when an &quot;Accept&quot; editorial decision has been recorded. Is there an &quot;Accept&quot; in place?
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>8179</commentid>
            <who name="Ramon Fonseca">ramon</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-12 11:22:49 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>There are now 3 options:

Accept Submission
Revisions Required
Decline Submission</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>8188</commentid>
            <who name="Ramon Fonseca">ramon</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 06:22:19 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>Sorry all,

The options listed are for the Track Editor only.

The reviewer still has 6 options.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>8195</commentid>
            <who name="Alec Smecher">alec</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 11:13:41 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>Corrected -- the extra option for reviewer recommendations has been removed. Ramón, were you able to double-check whether the submission that moved into &quot;In Editing&quot; had an Accept editor decision recorded?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>8198</commentid>
            <who name="Ramon Fonseca">ramon</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 11:31:14 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>The decision was changed to Revisions Required, but I&apos;m still able to change the decision to any of the 3 options.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>8199</commentid>
            <who name="Alec Smecher">alec</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 11:35:44 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>That&apos;s as it should be; if the last decision was &quot;Revisions Required&quot;, the submission should still appear in the Review queue, pending an author revision. When the author revises, the Director can come back and record an Accept or Decline to supercede the Revisions decision.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>8200</commentid>
            <who name="Ramon Fonseca">ramon</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 12:08:24 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>I think the option Resubmit Elsewhere should be Submit Elsewhere, since it seems to be inviting to resubmit the paper, but to another conference...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>8201</commentid>
            <who name="Alec Smecher">alec</who>
            <bug_when>2007-04-13 12:14:47 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>Comment #7: Agreed. OJS has two &quot;resubmit&quot; options, so it makes sense to word them similarly, but OCS doesn&apos;t.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>