<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://pkp.sfu.ca/bugzilla/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="4.2.5+"
          urlbase="http://pkp.sfu.ca/bugzilla/"
          
          maintainer="pkp-hosted@sfu.ca"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1652</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-05-26 22:02:00 -0700</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>RT: Improvements to deal with multiple search terms</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-09-24 08:45:21 -0700</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>OJS</product>
          <component>Reading Tools</component>
          <version>2.4.x</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>NEW</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          <dependson>2757</dependson>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Kevin Jamieson">kevin</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="PKP Support">pkp-support</assigned_to>
          <cc>alec</cc>
    
    <cc>john.willinsky</cc>
          
          

      

      

      

          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>4826</commentid>
            <who name="Kevin Jamieson">kevin</who>
            <bug_when>2005-05-26 22:02:20 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>From John:

&gt; This leads to the second issue of having more than two search terms, based
&gt; on how many the author introduced. Thanks for not caving on this, as I can
&gt; now see the advantages to having them all appear but I would then want to
&gt; change the advice given to readers. One approach would be to enable readers
&gt; to change the Boolean AND to an OR, which would then eliminate my initial
&gt; concern of continually getting nil results with a long Boolean AND search.

This is just one suggestion, and further discussion is needed prior to making
any changes. May also be deferred from 2.0.1 to a later release.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>4828</commentid>
            <who name="John Willinsky">john.willinsky</who>
            <bug_when>2005-05-27 08:42:49 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>Yes, I think it should be deferred, with possible approaches discussed.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <commentid>31524</commentid>
            <who name="Alec Smecher">alec</who>
            <bug_when>2012-09-24 08:45:21 -0700</bug_when>
            <thetext>John, is this still relevant?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>